Skip to main content

Table 3 The effect of the ratio of 55–59 years old in male full-time workers in 2003 on employment share of various types of employees

From: Effects of increased elderly employment on other workers’ employment and elderly’s earnings in Japan

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Full-time employees

Younger than 50

50–59 years old

60 or older

Full-time younger than 25

Female part-time 35–54 years old

Part-time 60 or older

Ratio of age 55–59 in 2003 × 2002

0.000

0.026

−0.019

−0.007

−0.030***

−0.020

0.004

[0.010]

[0.018]

[0.014]

[0.012]

[0.008]

[0.016]

[0.006]

Ratio of age 55–59 in 2003 × 2004

−0.002

0.020**

−0.025*

0.005

0.043***

−0.005

−0.001

[0.006]

[0.010]

[0.014]

[0.008]

[0.011]

[0.008]

[0.005]

Ratio of age 55–59 in 2003 × 2005

0.007

0.056*

−0.081***

0.025**

0.082***

−0.022***

0.002

[0.014]

[0.029]

[0.031]

[0.011]

[0.017]

[0.008]

[0.009]

Ratio of age 55–59 in 2003 × 2006

0.010

0.094**

−0.129***

0.035***

0.105***

−0.028*

0.001

[0.019]

[0.041]

[0.045]

[0.013]

[0.022]

[0.017]

[0.009]

Ratio of age 55–59 in 2003 × 2007

0.114*

0.211**

−0.256***

0.045*

0.148***

−0.106*

−0.002

[0.067]

[0.090]

[0.093]

[0.027]

[0.034]

[0.064]

[0.011]

Ratio of age 55–59 in 2003 × 2008

0.005

0.196***

−0.302***

0.106***

0.138***

−0.044

0.002

[0.025]

[0.073]

[0.098]

[0.033]

[0.030]

[0.029]

[0.012]

Observations

6745

6745

6745

6745

6745

6745

6745

R-squared

0.032

0.071

0.113

0.148

0.112

0.035

0.045

Number of establishments

1024

1024

1024

1024

1024

1024

1024

  1. Note: Standard errors with clustering for establishment ID are presented in brackets. *, **, *** indicate coefficients are statistically significantly different from 0 at the 10, 5, and 1 % levels, respectively. Control variables omitted from the table include industry-year dummies. Establishment fixed effects are also controlled