Skip to main content

Table 2 Actual employment protection legislation and firms’ behavior

From: Do firms make greater use of training and temporary employment when labor adjustment costs are high?

 

Provides training

Uses temporary workers

Provides training

Uses temporary workers

Firms characteristics

    

Age (Less than 5 years old)

    

5 to 15 years old

0.010

0.045

0.008

0.053

 

(0.019)

(0.018)*

(0.021)

(0.019)**

16 or more

-0.024

0.075

-0.034

0.099

 

(0.027)

(0.033)*

(0.031)

(0.039)*

Size (Less than 20 employees)

    

20 to 49 employees

0.212

-0.005

  
 

(0.045)**

(0.051)

  

49 to 99 employees

0.311

0.164

  
 

(0.048)**

(0.074)*

  

100 or more employees

0.457

0.182

  
 

(0.051)**

(0.121)

  

Publicly owned

0.028

0.007

0.060

-0.031

 

(0.037)

(0.035)

(0.040)

(0.048)

Innovator

0.174

0.073

0.167

0.099

 

(0.023)**

(0.026)**

(0.028)**

(0.029)**

Manufacturing sector

-0.037

0.112

  
 

(0.044)

(0.046)*

  

Domestic ownership

-0.094

-0.046

-0.093

-0.039

 

(0.019)**

(0.026)+

(0.019)**

(0.023)+

Country income level (Low income)

    

Lower Middle income

0.244

0.108

0.250

0.137

 

(0.071)**

(0.081)

(0.072)**

(0.074)+

Upper Middle income or high income

0.439

0.230

0.447

0.225

 

(0.049)**

(0.083)**

(0.047)**

(0.067)**

Labor regulations indexes

    

Regular employment regulations

0.888

0.468

  
 

(0.229)**

(0.199)*

  

Regular employment regulations* 20 to 49 employees

-0.329

0.099

  
 

(0.154)*

(0.140)

  

Regular employment regulations* 49 to 99 employees

-0.419

-0.265

  
 

(0.219)+

(0.216)

  

Regular employment regulations* 100 or more employees

-0.611

-0.423

  
 

(0.204)**

(0.354)

  

Regular employment regulations* US job flow

  

1.720

0.845

   

(0.440)**

(0.440)+

US job flow

  

-1.350

-0.478

   

(0.169)**

(0.181)**

Observations (number of countries)

10894 (43)

10512 (43)

Wald test for rho = 0

chi2(1) = 4.999

chi2(1) = 2.821

Prob > chi2 = 0.025

Prob > chi2 = 0.093

Predicted probability at the mean

0.534

0.449

0.538

0.446

  1. Marginal effects from bivariate probit model. Robust standard errors in parentheses (and adjusted for clustering on country). + = significant at 10%; * = significant at 5%; ** = significant at 1%. Where relevant, base categories of dummies are indicated in parentheses in italics.
  2. Data source: Investment Climate Surveys (World Bank).