Table 3 Informal and atypical employment, 2007
From: Do non-wage cost rigidities slow down employment? Evidence from Turkey
| Â | Total | Men | Women | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  | (15+) | (25–29) | (25–29) | (30-34) | (30–34) |
As a share of total employment: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Informal | 47.6 | 33.0 | 42.1 | 28.8 | 50.7 |
Flows into formal | 3.8 | 5.1 | 7.1 | 2.6 | 3.7 |
Flows into informal | 6.7 | 4.6 | 7.2 | 3.0 | 7.3 |
As a share of total flows into employment: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Flows into informal | 63.6 | 47.2 | 50.4 | 53.8 | 66.4 |
As a share of total employment: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Part-time | 9.4 | 2.7 | 14.0 | 2.7 | 18.4 |
Flows into full-time | 9.5 | 9.4 | 12.6 | 5.4 | 8.9 |
Flows into part-time | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 2.3 |
As a share of total flows into employment: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Flows into part-time | 10.0 | 3.6 | 12.2 | 3.3 | 20.3 |
As a share of total employment: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Temporary | 5.4 | 5.8 | 3.0 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
Flows into permanent | 6.1 | 6.6 | 10.3 | 3.3 | 6.0 |
Flows into temporary | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
As a share of total flows into employment: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Flows into temporary | 19.6 | 17.4 | 8.7 | 26.2 | 23.2 |