Table 4 Aggregate effect of the policy over the period

From: Do non-wage cost rigidities slow down employment? Evidence from Turkey

	(1)	(2)	(3)
	Quarter-year specific	Year specific	Period specific
DD results: young men
Hiring	0.050*	0.013*	0.003
	(0.027)	(0.008)	(0.003)
UE	0.024	0.007	0.002
	(0.020)	(0.008)	(0.002)
NE	0.017*	0.006*	0.001
	(0.009)	(0.003)	(0.001)
Separation	0.005	0.000	0.001
	(0.019)	(0.007)	(0.002)
EU	0.019	0.004	0.002
	(0.017)	(0.006)	(0.002)
EN	-0.014	-0.004	-0.002
	(0.008)	(0.003)	(0.001)
DD results: women
Hiring	-0.052***	-0.018***	-0.007***
	(0.016)	(0.006)	(0.002)
UE	-0.056***	-0.021***	-0.007***
	(0.014)	(0.005)	(0.002)
NE	0.004	0.003	0.000
	(0.010)	(0.004)	(0.001)
Separation	-0.020	-0.004	-0.003
	(0.016)	(0.006)	(0.002)
EU	-0.073***	-0.023***	-0.009***
	(0.013)	(0.005)	(0.002)
EN	0.051***	0.019***	0.006***
	(0.010)	(0.004)	(0.001)
DDD Results: women
Hiring	0.030	0.010	0.002
	(0.026)	(0.01)	(0.003)
UE	0.023	0.007	0.002
	(0.021)	(0.008)	(0.003)
NE	0.007	0.003	0.001
	(0.015)	(0.006)	(0.002)
Separation	0.007	0.001	0.001
	(0.023)	(0.009)	(0.003)
EU	0.010	0.001	0.001
	(0.018)	(0.007)	(0.002)
EN	-0.003	0.000	0.000
	(0.014)	(0.005)	(0.002)

Notes: (1) Bootstrap standard errors with 1000 replications are in parenthesis (*** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1) (2) Number of observations for the three specifications in the upper, middle and below panels are 144954, 147534 and 305590, respectively.

Back to article page