Wage returns to mid-career investments in job training through employer supported course enrollment: evidence for Canada

Table 6 Difference-in-differences average treatment effect by type of worker

		Panel 4		Panel 5
Matching Method	Treatment Result	Male	Female	Male	Female
Less than high-school workers
	ATT	0.050	0.068**	0.154***	0.075***
	Std. error	0.034	0.033	0.042	0.028
	N	858	756	804	690
Less than bachelor degree
	ATT	0.038**	0.073***	0.116***	0.077***
	Std. error	0.0174	0.016	0.021	0.017
	N	2369	2382	2315	2238
Bachelor degree or more
	ATT	0.122	0.063*	0.016	−0.004
	Std. error	0.037	0.035	0.048	0.038
	N	594	689	600	706

Notes: Propensity scores matching estimation based with Epanechnikov kernel weighting function with bootstrapped standard errors. Individuals in Panel 4 are tracked from 2002 to 2006, while individuals in Panel 5 are followed from 2005 to 2009. *** statistically significant at 1%, ** statistically significant at 5%, * statistically significant at 10%.