Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics, analysis sample

From: Misperceptions of unemployment and individual labor market outcomes

Variable

Mean or share

St. dev.

(Log) earnings, lower bound of decile (Euro)

7.353

0.659

(Log) earnings, upper bound of decile (Euro)

7.456

0.648

Misperception unemployment, p.p. (abs value)

12.81

13.03

If misperception positive

16.03

13.08

If misperception negative

3.084

2.007

Share of workers

  

With misperception positive

0.781

 

With misperception negative

0.087

 

(Log) regional unemployment rate

1.803

0.378

Female

0.405

 

Age

40.12

11.14

Education (less than upper secondary omitted)

  

Upper secondary

0.425

 

Tertiary

0.400

 

Ability1

0.956

 

Ability2

0.774

 

Firm size (1–99 omitted)

  

100–500

0.230

 

500+

0.184

 

Industry (other services omitted)

  

Primary sector

0.013

 

Manufacturing

0.203

 

Construction

0.073

 

Finance

0.045

 

Occupation (unskilled omitted)

  

Clerks, serv., sales

0.240

 

Skilled, machine opers

0.204

 

Managers, profls., technicians

0.459

 

Part-timer

0.102

 

Supervisor

0.365

 

Open end contract

0.828

 

Trade union member

0.264

 

Children below 16 (yes/no)

0.257

 

Partner (yes/no)

0.167

 

Number obs. a

2310

 
  1. Source: Computations are based on ESS (2008). Notes: The misperception index is computed according to Eq. 1 (i.e., the difference between the perceived and the actual unemployment rate in the country); to compute the share of workers with non-zero (i.e., positive or negative) misperception, we rounded the gap to the closest integer. ability1 equals one if the respondent understood the questions very often or often and zero otherwise; ability2 equals one if the respondent never or almost never required clarifications on the questions and zero otherwise. The computations use ESS post-stratification weights combined with population size weights
  2. a88 observations on earnings are left-censored and 89 are right-censored; data is missing for 11, 7, and 37 observations, on ability1, ability2, and part-timer, respectively. For the regional unemployment rate, the number of observations is 1700, as data are not available for four countries (see text)